雅思作文交通类话题

交通类话题是从属于社会类的大范畴的。这类话题主要考察的是考生对于一些常用的交通工具的了解，特别会要求利弊讨论。下面就来说说雅思作文交通类话题，千万别错过。

雅思作文交通类话题

一、汽车

典型例题：In some countries, the governments have tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hours. Do you think this development is positive or negative?

题目翻译：在一些国家，政府已经开始尝试减少交通量。比如说，他们会在拥堵时段征收拥堵税。你认为这种趋势是积极的还是消极的?

题目分析：本道题相对还是比较简单的，有可能出现困难的是在读题时a congestion tax(拥堵税)会影响理解。这道题目实际考察的是汽车拥堵所采取的措施。

二、公共轨道交通

典型例题：Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

题目翻译：政府应该把钱花在铁路建设上而不是公路上。你多大程度同意或不同意?

题目分析：这道题目是从属于政府的资金投放的问题，但是它同样也涉及到了交通方式，是railways和road两者重要性的对比。要答好这道题，首先要明白railway以及road所代表的是什么样的出行方式。就railway来讲，我们一般认为的就是sky train, underground train, long-distance train等(其实它们都从属于公共交通)，而road却包括bus,private cars, taxi, bicycle等出行方式。

所以这道题最本质的还是考察考生支持公交出行还是私家车出行。站在政府的角度上我们还是普遍偏向于把更多的钱放在railways上的，由于可以有效的解决traffic congestion and pollution problems.换个角度去想，如果钱投资在了road上，那么就会lead to the increase in the use of private cars,这就达不到政府最初的目的了。

三、飞机

典型例题：Long distance flightconsumes natural resources and pollutes the air. Some people think it should bebanned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

题目翻译：长距离的飞行会消耗自然资源和污染大气，因此有人认为这应该被禁止。你多大程度上同意或不同意?

雅思写作交通拥堵真题范文

In most cities and towns, the high volumes of road traffic become a problem. What are the causes of that and what actions could be taken to solve the problem?

题目讲解：

第一段：提出‘车太多’的问题

第二段：问题的原因1农民工和小城市的年轻人涌向大城市就业导致人口剧增，城市扩大，出行距离增加;2 大城市交通设施落后，无法容纳剧增的车辆。3 国家政策鼓励人们买车，以刺激经济发展。

第三段：第一个措施，建立卫星城，疏散人口和城市资源。鼓励人们住在工作单位附近。

第四段：第二个措施，改善公交系统，鼓励人们乘坐。

第五段：第三个措施，抑制私家车的使用。

写作范文：

In some major cities in my country, China, heavy traffic becomes increasingly problematic to commuters. This situation can be due to the fast pace of urban development.

The migration policy in China leads rural peasants to big cities. Also the convenient modern facilities and business opportunities in urban areas attract young generation in smaller towns seeking a reasonable career. While cities are expanding, the travellers have to cover further distance than they used to. Unluckily the public transport system built years ago is not well functioning. It is at this point that car purchase sounds reasonable. On top of this, the political will of enhancing economy should be responsible for various urban issues including traffic congestion. In order to stimulate domestic consumption, the public are encouraged to own their private cars, but in metropolises with dense population, such lifestyle is hard to be sufficiently supported.

To deal with traffic issue, some actions can be taken. Firstly, satellite cities can be a pragmatic approach to decentralize urban resource, thereby reducing urban population density. These satellite cities featuring self-sufficient can largely reduce daily travel if people are encouraged to live near their workplace or their school. Exclusive avenues for cycling can be set so that short-distance travellers would like to choose riding a bike instead of squeezing in a bus.

Public transport should be improved in terms of route, timing, comfortableness and service courtesy so as to encourage commuters to take. The larger capacity of public vehicles compared with private cars can effectively ease the traffic pressure on city roads.

In contrast, private cars should be discouraged from using for short distance travel. The approaches include charging a high parking fee, more expensive petrol or restricting in driving days.

雅思写作范文征收交通拥挤税

题目：In some countries, the government has tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative?

题目讲解：此次大作文考察的是政府类话题，要求论述政府试图缓解交通压力诸如征收高峰期通行费是利还是弊。

参考范文：

The traffic congestion issue has long been a public concern especially in some large cities worldwide. Whether governments should be involved in solving this problem has triggered a heated controversy. It is true that government intervention can bring some benefits to some extent, it is opposed by some people though.

交通拥堵问题长期以来一直是公众关注的问题，尤其是在世界各地的一些大城市。政府是否应该参与解决这个问题，引发了激烈的争论。的确，政府干预在一定程度上可以带来一些好处，但也有人反对。

Undoubtedly, governments posses greater authority than any other parties in the society, which means their intervention is comparatively effective. For example, the implement of congestion tax can directly lead to the deadline of traffic during those rush hours because of the increasing driving cost. Another advantage of government intervention is that governments can impact the public to a wider extent. Unlike some actions taken by the social communities, large companies or individuals, the projects carried out by governments have restrictions on every citizen living in the city or country. Once the traffic congestion is reduced, there will be many positive effects followed by, for instance, the commuting time can be largely reduced for those who need to travel to and from work.

On the other hand, the extra tax raised by the government will impose a negative effect on some people. One potential group influenced by this policy are those who have to drive to and from work. If this measure comes into effect, the financial burden on them is definitely higher. As a result, the well-being of these people may experience a deadline, which is against the aim of government policies.

In conclusion, benefits and drawbacks co-exits in terms of this tax policy. It can effectively solve the traffic problems to a large extent, while some damages can be caused to those who are taxed especially in the financial way.